SBF's Last Stand — With Molly White
Channel: Alex Kantrowitz
Published at: 2023-10-19
YouTube video id: YSBQ5El6ScE
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSBQ5El6ScE
a leading crypto researcher and skeptic joins us to discuss the Sam bakman freed FTX trial and what it means for the broader tech industry all that and more coming up right after this welcome to Big technology podcast a show for cool-headed nuon conversation of the tech world and Beyond we have a great guest for you Molly white is here she is a crypto researcher and critic she writes Molly White's newsletter which you can find at newsletter. Molly white.net I think she's probably the most Lucid crypto critic in the world today and she's been following the sand bankman free trial extremely closely as have I so it's great to have her on today Molly welcome to the show thanks for having me thanks for being here so let me just start with a really broad question which is why should anyone care about the Sam bigman free Trail like you know if you're not super involved in crypto if you haven't lost money in FTX I mean a lot of people right now are saying like don't even talk to me about this trial crypto is a sideshow and um doesn't have any application to anything more broadly do you agree with them or do you have a a different opinion on that front I definitely understand where they're coming from um but I do think that this trial is fairly historically important even outside of the crypto world I mean this is one of the largest financial frauds that we've seen in a long time you know people are comparing Sam bankman freed to Bernie ma off uh and I think not unreasonably um so I think there is you know reason to follow it just in that sense but I also think that it is absolutely important for the crypto World um you know I think this is momentous for the crypto world just in the sense that you know this is by far the largest litigation that we've seen uh in relation to that and I think will have major impacts on the future of the industry so uh I think it makes sense you know to sort of have at least an eye on the trial if if not follow it closely I think that's a good pitch for listeners to stay focused for like stay with us for the next 1550 minutes this is good stuff I do think it's consequential that's why we're dedicating an episode to it so now I think it's a good time to just talk a little bit about what Sam is accused of I mean he's got I think seven charges against him um can you run through exactly what he is accused of doing MH so he's actually got more than seven charges but there are seven charges that are being tried right now there's going to be a later trial for some other charges right now every everything that he is uh facing has to do with fraud on customers on lenders to his crypto exchange and his trading firm uh there's money laundering charges and then there's a bunch of conspiracy charges so uh all to do with basically you know at least allegedly misappropriating customer funds that were sent to FTX which was the crypto exchange um and then used by alanita research which was the trading firm uh to do their trading which they were really not supposed to be doing right and that's so that's the way that I understand it broadly also is that people the biggest problem here is that people put billions of dollars into FTX to trade crypto they had this secondary firm Alam research which then Drew on a massive line of credit uh using the funds that people had deposited into FDX and then spent that money and then couldn't pay it back I mean eight billion dollars that haven't been accounted for just the the first thing that that comes to mind after that is I mean this is pretty blatant you know it seems pretty obvious what could possibly have been going through the minds of s bakman Fred uh Caroline Ellison who ran alamida was his ex-girlfriend and everybody involved in this operation to say uh there are customer funds in FTX and we're going to use them bring them to Alam media and they were used for pretty unbelievable things that didn't really seem like they had a chance of you know returning any money including almost five billions of loans 5 billion in loans to Sam and his lieutenants I mean what could be the possible order of operations that runs through someone's mind that allows them to do that and think they're going to get away with it well I mean I think that they were probably hoping that Alan ma researches trading operations would go a lot better than they did um you know Alam research sort of started out in the runup to sort of a historic cryptocurrency bull market and so there was a period of time where a lot of people were making a lot of money on the market and you know it's possible that they were hoping that that would happen again and Alam would just you know make the right trades and make it all back or something like that um but I'm not I'm not really sure how they Justified this to themselves I mean it seems like s bankman freed had an extremely high tolerance for for risk um even when the possibility of things going wrong was substantially higher than the possibility of them going right he sort of felt that it was still appropriate to take that kind of risk um and so I think that might be a part of it um but you know it's really hard to say I mean I think that uh they were just hoping that things would go better in the crypto world than they were that um you know that people would be willing to loan money to have X and Alam if necessary um and that this would be like a temporary stop Gap maybe right and so even if they were good at making these bets still sounds like a crime um oh yeah the thing that's that's interesting is they may actually make the money back long term with their investment in anthropics so um I this is kind of a sidebar but do you think they have a chance of recouping I mean they led the series B in anthropic which is a big AI technology company does research has a chatbot like open AI founded by exop aai people now it's worth like a tremendous amount of money um still a crime I suppose if if that pays off but how do you think that might change like the legacy of Sam and the amount of time he spends in jail if at all yeah I think that's an interesting question and it's one that I think the defense has been sort of trying to make although it's unclear at this point to what extent they'll be allowed to make that argument because as you point out you know even if you make all the money back it's still a crime to you know do fraud on your customers but yeah I mean I think it is there is a chance that you know FTX customers may come out of this at least better off than customers of some of the other crypto companies that have fallen apart which is a fairly long list um and you know adding to that I would say the FTX bankruptcy team has been very aggressive in trying to claw back funds from all kinds of different places you know they I mean right now they're trying to get money back from Stan bankman Freed's parents like there's all these you know from different companies there's all these different actions in uh progress pertaining to that so you know I think that it's still going to be challenging but there is some potential that you know people might be made whole or at least close to it uh I think that may ultimately not be super relevant to S bankman Freed's Legacy I think it's hard to overcome the perception in the public eye that he was a fraudster which you know he was regard regardless of whether or not customers are made whole um and then I'm not sure necessarily how it will affect sentencing you know I know that the amount of money involved is relevant when uh the judge is determining what sentence to apply I don't know if you know they made the money back is something that would be considered there or if it's just the amount of money involved in the first place and they don't take into account you know later activities that um recovered some of the funds so I really can't speak to that part right okay so talk a little bit about the mechanics of how this worked so obviously you know Alam research this investment arm uh had had taken the money from FTX but what is it do they just go and transfer the money or how did this work and I mean obviously like you know they knew again that comingling funds from customer deposits is wrong so is there like a technical way that they did this to justify themselves or like what did it look like inside these this Exchange in this investment house yeah so I think there are a couple of ways that it happened um one was that there was this long history with the two firms where it was really challenging for FTX to get banking um banks have historically been hesitant to work with crypto firms and so there was a period of time where FTX did not have bank accounts but Alam research did and so they decided they would just circle IR vent that which itself is legally questionable by um send having customers send money to Alam which would then be sort of credited on their FTX accounts and so a lot of the issue here came down to the fact that um as things progressed as FTX was able to get bank accounts there was still an amount of you know US Dollars pretty much that was in an account that belonged to Alam research and so you know part of the argument that the defense has been trying to made is trying to make is that the accounting was bad they forgot about it and oops you know they used all that money um but that's not the extent of the ways that money was being pulled from FTX so Alam research also traded on the FTX exchange and they served as a market maker there and they were given the ability on that exchange to draw down a line of credit such that that they could have a massively negative account balance on FTX and that's something that was not in place for other firms or other market makers on FTX it was specific to Alam research and so they were given what was effectively a line of credit that was capped at like $65 billion which is just an obscene amount of money that they should really never have needed you know to to draw down upon but they did draw down on that line of credit to a fairly substantial amount over various times or various points in time um you know around1 billion or so and they were able to basically just withdraw crypto from the FTX exchange and then do with it what they liked you know they could be making trades with it but they were also just withdrawing it and using it for other purposes as well what are those other purposes uh a lot of it went to venture Investments so s bankman freed was investing in a bunch of different companies anthropic being one of them uh and he decided to do so through alamida for a lot of them um just to avoid having his name associated with it I mean there are all sorts of reasons so if you're basically an FTX customer you've now become an unwitting limited partner in Sam bankman freed Investments right yes which is not very not very good at what it was doing well it doesn't appear so except except for maybe anthropic anthropic yeah yeah um and then there were also a whole series of loans that were being made to alamer research Executives mostly for the benefit of s bankman freed so even though the money was going to his deputies it was often being used to make those Investments or to make political or charitable donations uh sort of on his behalf but via other people right and one of the things to me that was wild being in the courthouse watching Caroline Ellison testify is that the alamer research line of credit keeps getting bigger as the net asset value inside FTX keeps getting smaller can you kind of take us into exactly what was going on as it became clear that FTX had less money than Alam owed yeah so there was a period of time where um things were going really badly in the crypto markets uh you know crypto prices were falling and a lot of crypto companies were going under uh as a result of both the market and also just these sort of cascading failures um and as that was happening it started to put strain on some of the companies that were lending money to alamer research and so they started to recall their loans um and so they deci you know they needed to pay back these loans they didn't necessarily have much in the way of liquid assets because so much of the money had been put into these you know long-term Venture Investments and things like that and so they paid back these loans by taking basically drawing down that line of credit at um replacing effectively the loans with loans from FTX um and so you know as things went poorly as FTX was or and Alama were both struggling because of the wider crypto markets they were also racking up this enormous debt effectively to FTX customers because that was where the money was coming from yeah and that's what you can see in the court is just that they keep on borrowing more and they keep on having less and it seems like it's eventually going to you know hit a wall and it does I mean so one of the key questions is that whether Sam was aware of this and I think Caroline Ellison's testimony of that she kept on preparing balance sheets and rearranging things and naming them in interesting ways to make sure that you know Sam understood what was going on but the general public might not if they came across the documents was very interesting so can you talk a little bit about that yeah so there was a lot of sort of Creative Accounting going on that was trying to uh really mask all of this debt that Alam had um and so Caroline Allison testified to Preparing balance sheets for the company um and then at Sam bankman Free's request preparing what he referred to as alternative balance sheets uh and those were basically copies of the balance sheet where she would move around or rename entries so that it looked like you know the the loans to FTX Executives were just a part of some other spending uh she sort of removed some of the liabilities from some of the balance sheets you know it was all stuff I think I think in accounting you know there's some degree of flexibility where you know some of it's up to interpretation just exactly how you present things but this was like well beyond anything that would be accepted by any competent auditor um and so they she basically testified that she prepared those balance sheets at his request and then sent some of those alternative balance sheets to uh lenders and investors so that they thought that Alam was in a much better financial position than they were and you know there was testimony later on in the week from one of those lenders who basically said that had he had access to one of the more truthful balance sheets there's no way that his firm would have lent to to Alam exactly I mean there was a line item there where Ellison prepared it and she it was called FTX borrows and right it's like huh what does that mean but it's code for Alam borrowing money from FTX and you know during the court you during the case you saw month after month that line item go from like 8 billion to 10 billion to 13 billion and then the net asset value within FTX uh hover somewhere around 6 to 8 billion it's sort of even maybe even less because it's unclear they like marked their own token as being worth more than it was yeah that's another big part of this is that there was a lot of assets that they were holding that were strongly tied to the success of the FTX exchange and which a lot of these insiders have testified would never be able to be liquidated at anywhere near the price that they were putting on their balance sheets and so a lot of this money was sort of made up in the first place and talk about how it all comes to a head in November 202 2022 well that was a big part of it is the sort of madeup tokens um so FTX had this token called ftt which was effectively the the FTX token and there was a one of these balance sheets that had been prepared in in fact it was one of the sort of falsified balance sheets that showed a Rosier picture of things at Alam um was leaked by a crypt media Outlet called coindesk and even that falsified balance sheet was enough to really get people concerned conned about the financial stability of alam research and the extent to which it was really linked with FTX so you know Sam bman freed had spent a long time trying to maintain that FTX and Alam research were very separate that they were sort of firewalled and people realized that that really wasn't true once this balance sheet was leaked uh and so that sort of set off the initial concern around FTX there was then a later incident in which the CEO of uh FTX is largest competitor basically announced that he was going to sell a substantial amount of ftt tokens that he had this is easy the head of binance right uh he had you know the stash of ftt tokens that he had been given as uh FTX pretty much bought him out as an investor in the exchange and so he announced that he was going to sell these tokens which really sparked a panic that uh such a massive sale would decrease the price of ftt which would then make FTX potentially uh insolvent because of the degree to which they were relying on ftt as a part of their balance sheet and so that was when things really went badly um there was sort of a run on the exchange where everyone tried to withdraw their assets lenders were really concerned about loans to Alam so they simultaneously were trying to call back those loans um and so FTX you know for a a day or two was trying to meet these withdrawals and and repay these loans but very quickly that $8 billion hole in the balance sheet uh became an issue and they could no longer process withdrawals or repay those loans and that's the point at which FTX filed for bankruptcy yep so where is that $8 billion uh well some of it has been clawed back by the bankruptcy team but there's sort of a big question mark around you know exactly where it all went um it seems like it was a combination of bad trades uh Venture Investments loans you know donations to political and charitable causes uh real estate in the Bahamas I mean it's a really long list they were spending pretty uh extravagantly it seems like right does does this sound like a typical Ponzi scheme too like on one hand it's like yes it needed money flowing in the door but on the other hand they were making Investments I mean does does maybe it's like more of like just old school theft versus Ponte scheme or it's hard for me to kind of even wrap my head around how to classify this one what do you think yeah I mean I think it shares some traits with Ponzi schemes in the sense that they were sort of co-mingling funds they were trying to keep things afloat by bringing in more and more investors and trying to keep sort of trust in the whole scheme alive so that people would continue to put assets into the company but yeah I think I mean I think there's you know there are parts of it that are a little bit different as well um but it seems pretty clear to me that it was fraud one way or the other I mean everyone's flipped on Sam seems like everybody who was around him has flipped on him maybe outside of his parents um and Michael Lewis and Michael Lewis so well why don't we talk about his parents Michael Lewis and then kind of like where the the trial goes from so first of all his parents there were some emails that came out that like made it seem like his parents weren't just bystanders but active participants in this what can you tell us about that right so that was sort of what I alluded to earlier when I spoke about the FTX bankruptcy team trying to claw back funds from spf's parents um they filed a lawsuit against them which was quite descriptive of the activities that they were doing to try to prove that you know they were not being given these funds for any business purpose it was really just for for you know their own enrichment it was a gift pretty much um and there as a part of that lawsuit there were some emails back and forth where it really appeared that um his parents were sort of complicit in a lot of this so you know for those who aren't aware his parents are both Stanford law professors they teach ethics so well yes his mother was an Ethics Professor his father was a tax law professor and his his father were trying to pull off a I know it's like the Dream Team yes um and so his father was very active in some of the business where he was giving legal advice he was helping them recruit other lawyers um he was advising them on tax stuff you know there were there were emails where he was talking about trying to make assets bankruptcy remote uh taking advantage of Bahamian uh sort of tax law to to try to you know uh avoid paying taxes on a lot of the stuff and then there were also emails um from his mother who was a very active political uh sort of philanthropist she ran a fund to try to donate to Progressive causes and she was effectively making you know giving advice in these emails about making straw donations where you know Sam Bank pfree didn't want his name tied to some of these Investments for various reasons or maybe he was reaching caps on the amount that he could donate to some cause and so she was suggesting that the donations be made through the names of other FTX Executives um so I think it's pretty bad news for them you know I think there could be criminal charges filed against them if you know someone decided to go after it I don't know if they will but um I think they definitely face a strong risk that money given to them by their son will be clawed back by the bankruptcy estate uh money that is I think currently financing uh Sam bankman Freed's legal defense yeah one of the things that uh kind of struck me is like Caroline Ellison was sharing some of the things that Sam talked about inside the company was that he was very keenly aware of like these ethics tests like the New York Times tests where like you shouldn't say anything you don't want to see in front of like the New York Times it's like what you would teach in like day one in an ethics class and it's kind of showing up inside FTX as he's doing this crime I know we said we want to talk about Michael Lewis but I actually kind of want to go back to you know what happens from here I feel like we've talked about Michael Lewis enough on this podcast we'll give him a break this week um the the um everybody's flipped on him Caroline Ellison has some of his other business partners people who didn't even really have like charges brought against him have flipped in exchanged for immunity um does does he stand a chance I don't think he does um I didn't really think he did even before the trial started but now that we're you know a week or two into the trial it's looking pretty bad for for him and I don't see a strong defense being made honestly his his defense team has not been particularly impressive it seems like for reasons that are a little bit unclear to me um and so I really don't see a strong chance that he gets out of this without serious uh jail time yeah like their their cross-examination of Caroline Ellison like we thought that you know the people in the courtroom thought that the cross of Caroline Ellison was going to be fireworks in the case and it was extremely Meek actually that turned out the most interesting part of the case was Caroline just kind of walking through all the internal documents I mean I think it's rare that you have someone who is so directly involved in in a fraud uh just say all right well here are the receipts and I'm going to walk you through exactly what happened so yeah and in this case he's got several of those people all doing that you know people who are involved in various facets of it I think it's going to be really challenging to come back from that what is his defense just that he hired these people and they should have known better um like he didn't necessarily order the code red like they should have hedged or something I mean what do you say yeah I mean we've only really seen a preview of it because the defense has not made their case yet but um they have I think they at least towards the beginning were hinting that they might try to implicate Caroline Ellison in this and say that she you know technically she was the CEO over at LM to research they were trying to argue that s bankman freed had very little insight or control over what was happening there I think evidence maybe has painted a different picture on that um where there's sort of evidence that he was directly involved in a lot of this stuff even after she took the CEO role um they've also tried to make arguments uh well they're they're starting to sort of preview a new argument now which is that FTX terms of service maybe technically didn't prevent them from using the the funds and the ways that they did uh again I think it's going to be challenging to sort of watch that play out um but you know that they can try it I guess um and then yeah I mean I think I think the argument is you know one thing we were seeing a lot early on was it wasn't intentional he was maybe incompetent or you know not paying enough attention but he wasn't intentionally doing it right yeah he was just a small boy who made a mistake you know kind of the argument yeah and I don't think that's D drives a boring car right yeah that's that's a tough one to put up I mean it's just kind of if none of his contemporaries testified maybe that would have worked but they all did and showed that he was effectively in full knowledge of we'll see what he says yeah we'll see what happens but do you think he's going to testify so I don't know uh technically I have a bet going that he will um but a friend of mine who also sort of watches crypto uh markets uh but I actually don't know if there's a more likely chance than not that he will but you know as the trial goes on I feel like I'm getting more and more convinced that he will just in the sense that like what does he have to lose you know the defense has not been very strong uh maybe he'll do it as sort of a Hail Mary um I also am a little bit uh skeptical of his ability to um or his legal team's ability to sort of keep him in check I think his legal team probably would love for him to not testify um but you know go ahead I was just saying uh in the you know as in the early days of his uh you know as he was preparing for the defense after the charges had been filed against him he was talking to everyone who would listen because he seemed very convinced that like if he just talked in enough he would be able to convince people that he was innocent and so he was like blogging and tweeting and talking to journalists and talking on Twitter spaces with random people and like you know just trying to uh to make this argument any way he can and so you know that makes me think that he might believe the same thing like oh if I just talk to them I can get the jury to understand right and the judge has told him I mean people were buzzing about this in the court this was kind of the dramatic moment that everybody's been waiting for the judges said that if his lawyers don't advise him to testify and he still wants to anyway all he has to do is stand up and state his intention and he can take the stand I mean what a moment that would be huh yeah I mean I think the judge wants him to testify too you know if if uh if he gets up there and starts talking under oath you know I think that for the judge that would be the dream because like how do you appeal that right like at that point you know you have a pretty solid case but we'll see I mean we've got a couple weeks before that you had a something that you wrote a little bit about how this might not be as good for Sam as he thinks if he testifies because he's used to effectively talking circles around journalists and the jury might not appreciate that yeah exactly I mean he you know has previously you can just watch interviews with him both before and after charges were filed where someone will ask him a tough question and he'll just go into this long sort of rambly response where he doesn't always answer the question sometimes he just like changes the subject uh and you know gets into these really weird sort of verbose explanations of things and I think just relies on the fact that people don't understand him and aren't going to press too hard but in you know he's never had to testify under oath in front of a competent cross-examiner and so I think that you know his uh past experience might lead him to think that he can successfully just people on things whereas you know in real life in front of a judge and a jury that might go very differently right you've interviewed him before did you feel he was giving you the Run technically yeah oh yeah for sure uh he I think was probably lying to me when we were speaking um and you know he like I said that's just his sort of standard demeanor in interviews right okay I want to go to break but before we do what's your prediction of of where this case ends up is it is it going to I mean it seems like pretty clear that you think he's going to be found guilty what do you think the sentencing could look like if that's the case yeah I think I think you will be found guilty at least on you know substantial number of the charges uh it's hard to say and I'm certainly not legally qualified to to you've done the search though so yeah so speculate I think that you know 10 20 years is probably the minimum that we'll be seeing um but I also think that some of the headlines that I've been talking about 100 plus years might be a little bit overstating it just in the sense that those tend to rely on sort of flawed uh logic around how sentencing is done um but I think you know there's a good chance that he spends the rest of his sort of meaningful life in prison he could be pretty old by the time he gets out I mean he's 30 now so give him 30 years in prison and he's already 60 when he gets out and then the question is what does his legacy look like because it's not just okay so his sentencing is one thing but it's he will have shock waves that that will Ripple through not just the crypto industry with the tech industry and venture capital for years and that's why this is an interview that's not just about Sam's crimes although I think it was important that we laid it out what what's being alleged in court on in the second half of this conversation though we're really going to talk about what this is going to mean for venture capital for the effective altruist Community which is quite interesting and um and and where where else this could reverberate so we'll be back here in just a moment with Molly white stay tuned back right after this and we're back here on big technology podcast with Molly white she is a crypto researcher and critic she writes Molly White's newsletter you can find it at newsletter. Molly white.net so let's talk about the implications here first of all Molly I'm curious uh how do people get involved uh in this I'm not talking about the actual principles here I'm talking about the masses right that not only went to FTX to trade these crypto tokens uh but also went to Banks like Celsius and thought that they were going to get like a 20% return on their money and I'm just paraphrasing here you know citing broadly I'm sure I'm off by a percentage point or two um this was obviously something that was too good to be true how did so many people get caught up and believe in it well I think there was uh just sort of mass hysteria to some extent in the sort of 2020 2021 time period where you know everywhere you looked people were talking about crypto it was in the news it was on social media it was on advertisements and some people at least on paper were making a lot of money and so I think a lot of people decided they didn't want to get left out uh that was a lot of the marketing as well was you know don't be left behind come put your money in this crypto thing and um people really fell for it you know it was I think there's nothing like a good old get get-rich quick scheme where you know people always fall for those and the veneer of the technological sophistication was there you know there were really high-profile people talking about this stuff and then I think also people just aren't used to getting straight up lied to that was something that came out a lot in a bunch of these cases is they they were like you know Celsius was a was based in the US you know surely they must have been regulated surely someone was making sure they weren't just lying to us and turns out no that there was no one doing that until everything fell apart um so I think a lot of things went into it but you know it was it was this weird period of time where it was like reality had just been paused for a second yeah it was definitely a combination of greed if I'm summarizing right and fomo and then legitimacy conferred upon this type of uh company from people like Tom Brady who I wrote it down he was paid something like $55 million for 25 for 20 hours of work and you're like oh that's pretty good money for Tom but that $50 did a tremendous I mean sorry that 50 million did a tremendous they probably got great Roi on that I mean this is probably where all the billions are not only that they named stadiums uh after FTX down in crypto Capital the world Miami and uh you know I recall walking around downtown San Francisco and I still live there and you couldn't go 5T without seeing Sam's face being like plastered on some vestibule or bus stop or whatever it was right I mean it it does go to show you that spending that kind of money you know I mean they stole the money but allegedly but but you know that money did serve a purpose they were able to buy public opinion and get people to trust them it almost a Perfect Crime until they got caught yeah and I mean we've already seen FTX customers testifying that it was Those ads and the sponsorships and things like that that really made them think that this was legit you know they were like surely no one would be ad vering on the Super Bowl if you know they weren't in a financially good position and then you know turns out like this do some of the celebrities that were part of this are do they bear some responsibility like does Tom Brady have to think if it's too good to be true maybe there's something wrong here yeah I mean I'm kind of split on that I I do think that celebrities should be more thoughtful about the type of stuff that they're promoting and that you know they have to realize that they really do carry a lot of clout but on the other hand I don't necessarily know that it is the celebrities who should be tasked with making sure that these companies aren't frauds you know I feel like that's where the Regulators really should be stepping in saying that SEC has bigger responsibility than Tom Brady and Shaq for knowing whether this was a Pon scheme yeah I mean I think so I know it's a controversial opinion right there uh there but there was another part of it too which is Sam was like part of this effective altruism movement and uh I bringing Mike Lewis into it cuz I'm reading his book and he actually explains it quite well talking about basically that if you can if you can earn a ton of money over your life even as like a banker or you set up an exchange and you spend that to help people out you're going to be much more effective than let's say dedicating your life to be like in Doctors Without Borders actually that is more more impactful and Sam was part of this group which sort of and he he like maybe he didn't front and center talk about it too often but he always talked about how he's earning to give and he's he's trying to improve the world um and that Community also bolstered him I mean that that seems to me and that Community has Deep Roots through the tech world so what do you think is you know what do you think about that and what do you think the impact is going to be now that like he's the most famous or inFAMOUS effective altruist to walk the planet well yeah I think that a lot of people didn't know about effective altruism until the S bankman freed Saga happened and he unfortunately for them was the face of effective altruism in a good way before everything went wrong and then in a very very bad way um I don't know how they're going to recover from this honestly as a community other than maybe rebranding but uh you know the I think for sure yeah no for I think there's really no chance they don't but um you know he he was really the figurehead for this in a lot of ways because he was so visible and he was speaking so prominently about these philosophies and uh you know they were really trying to manage their reputation manage the reputation of the movement as Sam was the face of it and then you know as things went poorly uh I think they've discovered that there's sort of no coming back from this so it's interesting because anthropic right that open that open AI competitor that he invested in they're all not all but largely effective altruists at the top Dustin moscovitz uh the Facebook co-founder is ALS an effective altruist who by the way was behind that um the big pledge about AI pausing AI research talk about its dangers so they're very powerful group in Silicon Valley and it is very interesting to see how this is going to verberate with them yeah and I I mean I think that even if effective altruism under that name does not continue to exist I think the philosophy will um you know we've already seen sort of variations of it around like uh effective accelerationism and all these weird sort of spinoffs of it that are uh becoming weirdly popular especially in the tech sector I kind of hold two things when I think about effective altruism first of all it's obvious now like when someone comes and tells you their business is going to save the world so you should give them your money like maybe that's a big red flag on the other hand like I kind of like the philosophy of effective altruism like there is some logic behind what they're trying to do so I mean am I being like delusional think that effective altruism makes sense sort of on the face of it where like yeah obviously you want to donate money to the most effective causes you know you don't want to donate to ineffective altruistic causes that makes no sense um but then once you actually sort of dig into the philosophy and the way that they make decisions and the types of decisions that they've been making it gets really really weird really quickly to the point where like people in the movement start to yeah they start to talk about you know the the idea that future lives are more valuable than any life today on Earth and so therefore instead of spending money to prevent starvation or pandemics or whatever it might be we should all be focusing on the risks that uh are facing far future Generations like AI you know dystopia and all these crazy things or you know moving the whole world population to Mars or something like that and so it becomes you know it goes from being like yeah right effectively donating your money to like what you know very quickly where you know people would even talk about like sure we should sacrifice you know people today to save Millions tomorrow wow so that sort of now makes me understand that AI pledge a little bit more the fact that that's why there's so much of it yeah that's why the AI and effective alism overlap is so substantial oh that is very interesting hm yep wa they actually say that it's better to lose lives today to save lives tomorrow some of them do yeah there's a there's sort of a long-termism uh subset I guess so that's what their belief is in terms of long-termism that's they're talking about saving lives in the long term as being the number one priority even if it means that people are dying today yeah it's really really strange yes I could see how logically someone might talk themselves into it it's just like I don't know the deprioritization of people living today is a little bit odd and you did have Sam basically admitting that this was a do you think that he actually believed this stuff or did he kind of use it as a front because there was a Vox journalist who dm'd him and then published the DMS and said you were really good at talking about ethics for someone who kind of saw it as a game with winners and losers and he goes I had to be it's what reputations are made of I feel bad for those who got effed by it by this dumb game we woke westerners play where we say all the right she Bolis and so Everyone likes us yeah I think I mean I think to some extent he did believe it and I think to some extent it was just a convenient way to rationalize his behavior um he you know I think that the thing about effective altruism and especially about the earning to give portion of that Community is that you can rationalize a lot based on that type of philosophy I mean you could rationalize stealing $8 billion from your customers if you thought that it was going to be spent you know in a better way than they might have spent it themselves well there is this moment right in the trial where uh Caroline Ellison mentions that he told her that he was utilitarian and therefore if he thinks it makes the world better over time it's okay to lie and and steal right on the trial right and and he's talked about yeah and he's talked about uh you know his risk uh appetite for you know she said something about how he would say that if he were given the opportunity to flip a coin and if it came up Tails all of humanity would be destroyed he would do it so long as if it came up heads all of humanity would be more than twice as good like he had these types of risk uh equations in his head I guess where he was able to justify sort of whatever Behavior he wanted and and sort of understand himself to be a good person as a result of it um so I do think you know he did believe some of the stuff but I also think that it was very effective to tell people that you know oh no I'm not making money for myself I'm making money because I want to save the world you know that's an attractive cell to people who might not otherwise care too much for you well it worked obviously to great a great effect um we'll see if people are skeptical after this I I hope so so where do you think crypto goes after this I mean obviously we've seen a great evaporation of wealth both in the falling of uh so many coins like going from basically 3 trillion to a$1 trillion industry uh within a couple months and then these billions of dollars that were lost in FTX what is the future for crypto well I think it's going to be challenging uh reputationally to come back from this but I do think that they will certainly try um you know the I think people in sort of the general public see FTX and bankman freed as almost synonymous with crypto where you know because he was so prominent the advertising was so prominent because he was talking to Congress you know he was very visible um for a lot of people that was all they really knew about crypto and so seeing this failure to them is like seeing crypto fail and I think that'll be really challenging for the crypto industry to move past um they've certainly been trying to sort of say like oh well Sam bankman freed wasn't crypto he was just one fraud you know real crypto is is all better than this um but I think that's a challenging distinction for a lot of people to make in sort of the more lay public um but I also know that you know if there's one thing about crypto it's that it's very good at rebranding itself you know we've seen crypto go through these boom and bus Cycles where it gets really big and then something goes bad and it all crashes down again and then you know 2 years later it's like nobody remembers what just happened I mean you could look back at the collapse of like mount gaau for example which was devastating to crypto it was you know the one of the biggest uh scandals in the crypto world this was for those who are not familiar it was an early crypto exchange that eventually basically lost everyone's money but by 20120 when people were talking about putting their money into crypto exchanges again it was like no one remembered that ever happened so you know I have some worry that people will just sort of move on from this or that crypto will so successfully Rebrand itself as something else that you know in a couple years we'll be going through this all again now Molly I asked on Twitter earlier uh what should I ask you and uh and and basically the questions boiled down to there was a number of varieties of this but I'm going to try to synthesize them you know are there legitimate uses for crypto and can this industry sort of function in a way that does not include some of the stuff we've seen with the maloes and the FTX so I'm curious what you think well I mean I think there it depends sort of how you define that question I think there are people trying to do legitimate things with crypto I don't necessarily think that they are succeeding at them very well um you know there are all kinds of things you could potentially do with crypto it's just you know in the when you get down to it it's just sending money from point A to point B uh but you know the the actual implementations of these things have been really flawed to to date and sort of poorer implementations of systems that already exist I would say in the in the broad Strokes um but do you see any good use cases for let's say like you know the blockchain or nfts or anything like that or is it just sort of only in the very limited circumstances you know I think that you can point to instances where people have benefited from crypto you know you could say like oh look at this person who was trying to a flee an authoritarian government and they were able to get their assets out of the country you know despite Capital controls you know using Bitcoin or whatever and it's like yes okay good that was a use case that was you know helpful for a person but I don't see that as sort of a promising future use case in any sort of scalable way and I also don't think it's by any means something you can base an entire industry around um and so you know the the companies that are trying to create you know the future of finance using blockchains or you know tokenize your Rolex using an NFD I don't think there's much future for them what do you think this is going to mean for a venture capital firm like andrees Horowitz right they raised billions of dollars they told us that crypto was going to not only you know save the world but create well not only create a new internet but effectively save the new world save the world right just like the evangelism from that company um was something I've never seen come from a VC firm and they were the most outspoken proponents of crypto I me of course plenty of VC firms and I guess as a VC firm you have to bet on it but they it did seem like they went a little overboard um yes what happens to all that money what happens to their reputation um what do you make of this whole moment with Andre and Horowitz and crypto well I mean I think sadly Andre and Horowitz probably came out of this financially kind of okay because with the the well the crypto Venture Capital model is very landed towards the venture capitalist where they can invest money in a firm they receive these tokens before anyone else gets access to them the firm launches their token and then there's this huge spike in price because people get really excited about it especially if Andre and Horowitz has been promoting it or you know some other uh high-profile person has been promoting it and then andrees and Horowitz or or whichever Venture Capital firm can immediately sell those tokens and make massive returns effectively off of the backs of these retail customers who then lose money because the token goes down in price there's this like graph that you see in the crypto world where um a firm launches a token it goes way up in price the venture capital is sell and it comes way back down again and so everyone else loses money but the Venture capitalists are fine and so you know I think that that model served them really well and it's unpleasant you know if people understand that that's how it works but I think that people don't and so they're like great you know they're making great returns um I think the reputational aspect of it you know I think they should be embarrassed by this and I think people should view them negatively for this pretty blatant tux turism that they were involved in because you know they this evangelism that they were doing where they were saying that web 3 is the future and crypto is going to be how everything works in 10 years was you know pretty nakedly being done to promote the tokens so that they could make these returns and so I think people should really think twice about these firms and and you know any statements that they're making like this uh you know especially as we're entering sort of new tech hype Cycles every couple of years you know if you see a firm that's saying stuff like that about for example AI like maybe you should question the motives Behind These bold predictions that they've been making um I don't know necessarily how much people will actually hold them to account for their past statements or you know actually if there will be any shift in the impression you know most people have of Andre Horwitz but I certainly think there should be well the thing is that the constituency that they have really is the limited partners who are going to get paid back like um if a network of companies like screw retail investors like they're going to be I mean I guess some might be meted into recent horites but it's they lose little by building up the hype and gain much uh even if it turns out to be a complete aberration I think that's exactly right and it seems to be that's what happened um two more questions for you first of all uh Bitcoin seems like if you're if you're talking about how like crypto might have a future as a place to move money Bitcoin might be that future right and it it does seem like there's some move from institutional investors like I believe it's called grayscale they're putting together a uh coin de uh sorry a uh an ETF of Bitcoin and the SEC is sued to stop it and now and they lost and they're not going to appeal and everyone's like oh these banks are bringing legitimacy to bitcoin and bitcoin's going to Skyrocket again what do you make of that I think beyond anything else it is enormously ironic um because if you actually look back at the history of Bitcoin and like the white paper that was released when Bitcoin was first created it's all talking about how banks are so uh you know uh Twisted that the financial system is broken I mean Bitcoin was created in the wake of the global financial crisis and so there was this enormous lack of trust in the banking system and in traditional finance and Bitcoin was created pretty much to do away with that whole system and so now we're seeing grayscale and black rock and all of these you know huge financial institutions Fidelity JP Morgan you know they're they're starting to talk about crypto they're looking at these ETFs and I think it's just hilarious that that's sort of where we've come from this you know now the same system that was supposed to subvert the financial system is being adopted by them because they feel like they can make a profit off of it um will it add legitimacy I mean it it it did it does look like when Bitcoin when these uh the appeal was basically dropped uh Bitcoin went through the well it surged and right that is because people believe that if the banks are adopting it there's going to be legitimate use for it yeah I think it's important to note that Bitcoin prices surge on the news of this not because there is an influx of institutional investors or you know retail investors who would who are buying these products but because the crypto people believe that there will be future inflows of money and so it's really just the belief it's not actual money coming in when these uh Market moves happen based on that news um I think that to some extent you know these types of things are used to legitimize crypto but I think it's important to note that we've had that type of institutional adoption for years now where you know grayscale Bitcoin trust has been around for years um you can if you want to say that grayscale is involved in crypto you don't need a spot ETF to make that argument they've already been doing that um people have been pointing at headlines that claim at least to show that these huge institutions are involved with crypto even if that's not always the case uh for a very long time and so I don't actually know to what extent the approval of a Bitcoin ETF a spot Bitcoin ETF or something like that will actually move markets versus um you know just the belief that maybe it will someday you know we've seen there was recently an approval of an ethereum ETF that people thought was going to be the biggest thing and it was extremely embarrassing the you know the lack of attention that people put into this and the the level of volume that was being traded so you know I think people have their hopes really high but it remains to be seeing exactly what happens if if these types of products are approved okay last question well do you do you own any crypto yourself uh I have a small amount that I use just for research purposes but it's not anything substantial so here's the last question there was kind of a joke that came in when I sent that tweet about what I should ask you but I'm going to ask it anyways someone goes uh should I buy Bitcoin no okay I mean do whatever floats your boat but I I wouldn't Molly thank you so much for joining this was great hope to have you back sometime soon thanks for having me okay great thanks for being here thanks everybody for listening thank you nck guatney for handling the audio thank you LinkedIn for having me as part of your podcast network uh and thanks to all of you the listeners really appreciate you tuning in appreciate your feedback week after week it's great to hear from you as we drop these and uh get a sense as to how you feel about them so thanks for chiming in okay uh that'll do it for us this week join us again Friday we're going to be covering the week's news probably a little bit more on the trial but lots more about the tech World more broadly so thanks again for listening and we'll see you next time on big technology podcast